MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417470035 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0339043

Effect of creep-feeding supplementation during the pre-weaning phase on gene co-expression in Longissimus thoracis muscle of F1 Angus x Nellore calves at weaning

2025· article· en· W4417470035 on OpenAlexaff
Henrique G. Reolon, Gabriel Luiz Navarro Liberal, Germán Darío Ramírez-Zamudio, Guilherme Luís Pereira, Juliana Akamine Torrecilhas, Welder Angelo Baldassini, Marcos Eli Buzanskas, Otávio Rodrigues Machado Neto, Luis Artur Loyola Chardulo, Rogério Abdallah Curi

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsIntramuscular fatMarbled meatWeaningAdipose tissueTranscriptomeSkeletal muscleGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to analyze gene co-expression in skeletal muscle of calves with or without creep-feeding during the pre-weaning phase. Forty-eight F1 uncastrated male Angus-Nellore calves were divided into two groups: G1 - no creep-feeding, and G2 - creep-feeding. After weaning (210 days), all animals were kept in the feedlot for 180 days under the same conditions. Weaning weight, backfat thickness, and intramuscular fat content were significantly higher in G2, with intramuscular fat and marbling score being 17.2% and 14.0% higher, respectively, compared with G1 (P < 0.05). Longissimus thoracis muscle samples were collected at weaning for transcriptome analysis (RNA-Seq) in 12 animals of each group. Gene co-expression analysis using the CEMiTool R package identified seven modules; five showed differential activity between groups (adjusted P < 0.002). Modules 1, 2, and 3 showed the greatest association with treatments. Hub genes and enrichment in biological pathways and processes were identified in these modules. The absence of supplementation was associated with increased connectivity of hub genes involved in insulin signaling, oxidative metabolism, and cell cycle regulation, including CDKN1A, FOXO1, and NAMPT. These genes were enriched in processes related to lipid oxidation and response to ketone bodies, suggesting reduced myogenic and adipogenic activity. Notably, FOXO1 has context-dependent effects on adipogenesis, acting as both an inducer and inhibitor depending on the differentiation stage. In contrast, supplementation increased the activity of hub genes involved in cell signaling, muscle development, and differentiation, such as ITGB6, REEP1, TPCN1, PPARA, PTPN11, and MAP3K20, and enriched processes associated with muscle and adipose cell development. In conclusion, creep-feeding supplementation during the pre-weaning phase altered gene co-expression in skeletal muscle, activating pathways related to myogenesis, adipogenesis, and energy metabolism. These results suggest potential lasting molecular effects consistent with increased intramuscular fat deposition during finishing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→