MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In Array Time-to-Digital Converter with 10 ps LSB and 43 μM × 35 μM Area in TSMC 65 nm

2025· article· W4417471835 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guillaume Théberge‐Dupuis, R. Scarpellini, Raffaele Aaron Giampaolo, N. Roy, T. Rossignol, Samuel Lavoie-Drainville, J.‐F. Pratte, Serge A. Charlebois

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime-to-digital converterDetectorLyso-Vernier scaleDiodePhotonSilicon photomultiplierIntegral nonlinearityNuclear electronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many applications in nuclear science and medical imaging use scintillators to convert high-energy photons or particles into multiple photons that can be detected with silicon light detectors. For applications where the time of interaction matters, such as time-of-flight (ToF) positron emission tomography and ToF computed tomography, we need to timestamp the first photon detected. Unfortunately, single-photon detectors are subject to dark counts, which adds uncertainty to the measured timestamps. To better evaluate the time of interaction, we can use an estimator constructed on the first few timestamps. Thus, multiple time-to-digital converters (TDC) are required in the detector for the estimator to operate. Our team at the Universit'e de Sherbrooke is working on a 5 mm × 5 mm photon-to-digital converter (PDC). The detector is composed of 4096 single photon avalanche diodes (SPAD) 3D integrated with a TSMC 65 nm ASIC composed of an array of 4096 quenching circuits and 512 TDCs. As a stepping stone to the full-size PDC, we developed a test chip that includes 32 SPADs, 32 quenching circuits (QC), and 16 TDCs. The TDC is a 43 μm × 35 μm ring oscillator-based cascaded Vernier TDC with 2 stages. The TDC was characterised in multiple configurations: standalone, in group of 8, and in group of 16 running at the same time. Only a difference in the integral nonlinearity was observed at the target resolution of 10 ps. At this target resolution, we measured a precision of 4.1 ps rms, an average conversion time of 8.6 ns, and a power consumption of 28.6 μW at 1 Mcps. A test campaign will be done in Q3 2025 to evaluate the stability of the device and obtain a single photon timing resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207