MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

YRT-PET-NX: Development of a Plugin for an Open-Source PET Reconstruction Platform to Support the NeuroEXPLORER

2025· article· W4417472385 on OpenAlexaff
Yassir Najmaoui, Kathryn Fontaine, David Fontaine, Jing Zhang, Tao Zeng, Tommaso Volpi, Yanis Chemli, J.-D. Gallezot, Marc‐André Tétrault, Richard E. Carson, Georges El Fakhri, Thibault Marin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPlug-inIterative reconstructionSoftwareImage resolutionDetectorVendorImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultra-high resolution PET scanners offer multiple benefits to brain imaging for researchers and clinicians. The NeuroEXPLORER (NX) scanner, a brain-dedicated PET system with high resolution and high sensitivity, achieves exceptional image quality. These benefits, however, introduce challenges for image reconstruction in terms of speed, memory usage and need for accurate system modeling and motion correction. Open-source third-party image reconstruction tools can be a valuable substitute to manufacturer software to address these challenges, as well as to enable the evaluation of different modeling approaches and algorithms. In this work, the opensource PET reconstruction platform YRT-PET (Yale Reconstruction Toolkit for Positron Emission Tomography) is extended through a plugin to support the NX scanner. YRT-PET provides a scanner-agnostic reconstruction platform with research-oriented features. The YRT-PET-NX plugin integrates detector geometry, listmode packet decoding and scanner-specific corrections. We evaluated the performance by reconstructing a mini-Derenzo phantom, a non-human primate, and a human brain, comparing YRT-PET results with those from the vendor software and the MOLAR engine. Based on the mini-Derenzo reconstructions, comparable resolution was achieved, with a slight gain in peak-to-valley ratios. Across both non-human primate and human datasets, YRT-PET produced nearly-identical images. Time-activity curves for the non-human primate were quantitatively consistant, with a 5 - to 18 -fold reduction in reconstruction time due to GPU acceleration. These results demonstrate that the YRT-PET-NX plugin enables efficient and highquality reconstructions comparable to preexisting and established software. This work enables the features of YRT-PET alongside the high resolution of the NX. Future work aims to expand support for additional corrections such as randoms and scatter estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→