Maintaining and Monitoring Stator End-Windings on Electrical Rotating Machines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stator end-windings are critical focus area in large electrical rotating machines, particularly in medium and high voltage motors and generators. These components face numerous challenges due to the elevated voltage gradients, exposure to cooling media, vibration, and the manual, handcrafted nature of their construction. The intricacies involved in forming and connecting the end-windings make them susceptible to more variation than other parts of the winding, potentially introducing imperfections that can impact the reliability and performance of the machines over time. The importance of maintaining and monitoring end-windings cannot be overstated, as they are vital for the overall health and reliability of electrical rotating machines. Continuous improvement and focus on potential interventions are essential for owners, operators, and service engineers. This paper aims to share practical experiences in assessing end-windings, identifying early indications of potential issues, and presenting case studies where corrective actions were successfully implemented to avert catastrophic failures and to improve the service life. The discussion will emphasize also on challenges associated with on-site repairs. Often, there is a pressing need to design specialized tools and engineer processes that can be executed in-situ, ensuring the quality of repairs matches that expected from a dedicated service shop facility. The paper will cover various assessment techniques, both visual and measurable, to highlight areas where existing literature is sparse. This information aims to support engineering and technical consultants in determining the ideal timing for interventions and improving the overall maintenance strategy for stator. By focusing on real-world problems and solutions, this paper intends to provide valuable insights into the end-winding maintenance and repair process. It will offer practical guidance to those involved in the operation/servicing of rotating machines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".