MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Maintaining and Monitoring Stator End-Windings on Electrical Rotating Machines

2025· article· W4417473199 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre B. Romanato, Saeed Ul Haq, Renato Yabiku

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)StatorService (business)Quality (philosophy)Focus (optics)Cover (algebra)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stator end-windings are critical focus area in large electrical rotating machines, particularly in medium and high voltage motors and generators. These components face numerous challenges due to the elevated voltage gradients, exposure to cooling media, vibration, and the manual, handcrafted nature of their construction. The intricacies involved in forming and connecting the end-windings make them susceptible to more variation than other parts of the winding, potentially introducing imperfections that can impact the reliability and performance of the machines over time. The importance of maintaining and monitoring end-windings cannot be overstated, as they are vital for the overall health and reliability of electrical rotating machines. Continuous improvement and focus on potential interventions are essential for owners, operators, and service engineers. This paper aims to share practical experiences in assessing end-windings, identifying early indications of potential issues, and presenting case studies where corrective actions were successfully implemented to avert catastrophic failures and to improve the service life. The discussion will emphasize also on challenges associated with on-site repairs. Often, there is a pressing need to design specialized tools and engineer processes that can be executed in-situ, ensuring the quality of repairs matches that expected from a dedicated service shop facility. The paper will cover various assessment techniques, both visual and measurable, to highlight areas where existing literature is sparse. This information aims to support engineering and technical consultants in determining the ideal timing for interventions and improving the overall maintenance strategy for stator. By focusing on real-world problems and solutions, this paper intends to provide valuable insights into the end-winding maintenance and repair process. It will offer practical guidance to those involved in the operation/servicing of rotating machines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207