MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417477025 · doi:10.1186/s12890-025-04003-2

Risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review

2025· review· en· W4417477025 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wang Juan, Hui Ji, Zhongjian Li, Xueying Li, Rui Liu, Min Li, Wang Xiu

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pulmonary Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPneumoniaExacerbationAcute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRisk assessmentMEDLINERisk factorPulmonary disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients with Acute exacerbations of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and other databases for studies investigating risk factors for VAP in patients experiencing AECOPD. The search encompassed records from database inception up to July 2, 2025. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 18.0. RESULTS: A total of 16 articles were included, encompassing 3,664 subjects and 16 risk factors. Meta-analysis results showed that, Age (OR: 2.49, 95%CI : 1.49, 4.17; P < 0.001), Smoking history (OR: 2.70, 95%CI : 1.65, 4.44; P < 0.001), Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation composite score (APACHE Ⅱ) score (OR: 3.03, 95%CI : 1.98, 4.65; P < 0.001), Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (OR: 2.75, 95%CI : 1.90, 3.99; P < 0.001), Diabetes (OR: 2.11, 95%CI : 1.38, 3.24; P = 0.001), Underlying Diseases (OR: 3.42, 95%CI : 1.85, 6.32; P < 0.001), Duration of mechanical ventilation (OR: 4.53, 95%CI : 2.68, 7.65; P < 0.001), Tracheal intubation (OR: 4.21, 95%CI : 1.85, 9.57; P = 0.001), Indwelling gastric tube (OR: 3.31, 95%CI : 1.38, 7.95; P = 0.008), Total parenteral nutrition (OR: 1.86, 95%CI : 1.29, 2.70; P = 0.001), Combined antibiotics (OR: 2.79, 95%CI : 1.32, 5.93; P = 0.007), Tracheotomy (OR: 2.92, 95%CI : 2.04, 4.17; P < 0.001), History of mechanical ventilation within one year (OR: 2.92, 95%CI : 2.04, 4.17; P = 0.005), Use acid suppressants (OR: 2.10, 95%CI : 1.49, 2.97; P < 0.001) were associated with the development of VAP in AECOPD patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified 14 risk factors associated with the risk of VAP in AECOPD patients. This finding is helpful for early identification of high-risk patients, which is of great value for reducing mortality and improving the clinical prognosis of patients with mechanical ventilation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Pulmonary MedicineSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207