MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417482657 · doi:10.1177/00220345251392876

Histatin–Photodynamic Therapy for Polyene-Resistant Biofilms in a 3D Model

2025· article· en· W4417482657 on OpenAlexafffund
Luana Mendonça Dias, Ana Cláudia Pavarina, Walter L. Siqueira

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dental Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCentros de Pesquisa, Inovação e Difusão, Fundação Amazônia Paraense de Amparo à PesquisaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsBiofilmAntimicrobialViability assayDownregulation and upregulationBacteriaBiocompatibility

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oral candidiasis is primarily caused by Candida albicans ; however, bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans can also coexist and cooperate within the same biofilm. This study evaluated the combined effects of Histatin 3 (His3) and Histatin 5 (His5) with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) using a 3-dimensional oral epithelium model infected with mixed biofilms of C. albicans (polyene-resistant strains) and S. mutans . The tissues, divided into groups (His3 + aPDT, His5+aPDT, His3, His5, or aPDT), were first treated with the salivary proteins His3 or His5 (2 h, 37 °C, 60 rpm/min) followed by infection with mixed biofilms. After 24 h of biofilm formation, aPDT was applied (PDZ: 200 mg/L; LED light: 660 nm with 50 J/cm²) using intermittent irradiation cycles ( n = 9/group). Biofilm viability (CFU/mL), total proteins (intracellular and extracellular), and proteomic analysis were performed. Biocompatibility and tissue invasion were also assessed by MTT assays and histological analysis, respectively. His3+aPDT and His5+aPDT reduced mixed biofilm viability by 67% ( P = 0.0038) and 65% ( P = 0.0062), respectively. His3 and His5 alone promoted a 35% to 45% ( P = 0.018; P = 00.24) reduction, while aPDT alone reduced by 50% to 55% ( P = 0.022; P = 0.037). Combined treatments enhanced efficacy by ~30% compared with individual treatments. Histological evaluation also confirmed reduced biofilm penetration and hyphal formation, particularly with His5+aPDT. Proteomic analysis of the proteins from C. albicans revealed the downregulation of structural and transport proteins, which can likely weaken the biofilm. The combination of His3 and His5 with aPDT enhances antimicrobial efficacy against resistant multispecies biofilms while maintaining biocompatibility. By reducing biofilm viability and compromising proteins, this approach provides a promising alternative for treating oral candidiasis associated with polyene-resistant C. albicans species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dental ResearchSame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207