MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417496690 · doi:10.1061/joeedu.eeeng-8251

An Integrated Approach to Assess Sediment Stability in River Ecology for Contamination Control

2025· article· en· W4417496690 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng He, P. Chittibabu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlumeSedimentHydrology (agriculture)Debris flowCoringSediment transportChannel (broadcasting)Water flowUnderwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowing the stability of the contaminated sediment under different river discharges is critical for assessing its impact on the surrounding environment and downstream water quality. However, determining sediment stability in the field presents a challenge because it is difficult to measure the bed shear stress (BSS) directly, which is a crucial factor in determining sediment erosion. In addition, numerous indirect methods are subject to significant uncertainties. To enhance the reliability of sediment erodibility assessments, verify the results obtained, and examine the sediment stability under extreme river flow rates, unlike most similar studies that use only one or two methods, a comprehensive approach with the development of new techniques and devices was employed in this study. This included (1) estimating sediment BSS from flow velocity vertical profiles obtained by the deployed acoustical instruments based on the widely applied law of the wall; (2) using an open channel flume with a particle imaging velocimetry system in the laboratory to determine the sediment critical bed shear stress (CBSS) at the different depths from collected sediment samples; (3) using a newly developed portable in situ flume indirectly to measure sediment CBSS in the field; (4) developing a long-term standalone underwater camera system to monitor the sediment movements under different river flow rates and verifying results obtained by other applied methods; and (5) using a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model to investigate sediment stability under extreme river discharge conditions. The possible measurement errors occurring in various applied methods were discussed. According to this study, widely used and established methods, along with well-controlled laboratory environments, can still produce large uncertainties. Sediment stability studies should employ an integrated approach, such as the combination of field measurements, laboratory assessments, and on-site direct monitoring, to verify the obtained results directly or indirectly. A more comprehensive study can be developed in the future based on the findings of this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207