MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417498233 · doi:10.1002/ejhf.70074

Contemporary Medical Therapy for Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum: The OPTIPHARM-HF Registry

2025· article· en· W4417498233 on OpenAlexaff
Riccardo M. Inciardi, Maurizio Volterrani, Gianluigi Savarese, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Chiara Oriecuia, Carlo Lombardi, Cristina Gussago, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Pietro Ameri, Giuseppe Armentaro, Chiara Arzilli, Nadia Aspromonte, Andrea Attanasio, Roberto Badagliacca, Lucia Barbieri, Pier Paolo Bocchino, Francesca Bursi, Matteo Cameli, Martino Canonero, Jeness Campodonico, Teresa Maria Capovilla, Erberto Carluccio, Stefano Carugo, Vincenzo Castiglione, Dario Catapano, Manlio Cipriani, Michele Correale, Domenico D’Amario, Raffaele De Caterina, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Emilia D’Elia, Luca Di Odoardo, Michele Emdin, Luigi Falco, Giulia Ferrante, Alessandra Fornaro, P Fornaro, Gionata Guastamiglio, Marco Guazzi, Massimo Iacoviello, Massimo Imazio, Enrico Incaminato, Maria Teresa La Rovere, Sergio Leonardi, Marta Maccallini, Giulia Elena Mandoli, Daniele Masarone, Marco Masetti, Alberto Mazzoni, Marta Mazzotta, Marco Merlo, Luigi Moschini, Filippo Novarese, Alberto Palazzuoli, Maria Concetta Pastore, Giuseppe Patti, Roberto F.E. Pedretti, Stefano Pidello, Massimo Piepoli, Giuseppe Pinto, Luciano Potena, Claudia Raineri, F. Rubbo, Mario Sabatino, Andrea Salzano, Angela Sciacqua, Michele Senni, Paolo Severino, Gianfranco Sinagra, Barbara Sposato, Stefano Taddei, Alessandro Valleggi, Carlo Vignati, Carmine Dario Vizza, Claudia Specchia, Giuseppe Rosano, Marco Metra

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
FundersNovo NordiskCytokineticsBoston Scientific CorporationEdwards LifesciencesTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesAstraZenecaBayerAmerican RegentServierDaiichi-SankyoAmgen
KeywordsHeart failureMedical therapyEjection fractionHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Despite guideline recommendations, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains underused and underdosed in patients with heart failure (HF) across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum. The aim of this study was to evaluate GDMT use, dosing, and implementation in a contemporary, nationwide HF cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: The OPTIPHARM-HF (NCT06192524) is a prospective, multicentre, observational study enrolling adult patients with HF, across 32 Italian HF centres. Clinical characteristics, medical therapy prevalence and change after first visit have been assessed in patients with reduced (HFrEF: EF ≤40%), mildly reduced (HFmrEF: EF 40-49%), and preserved EF (HFpEF: EF ≥50%). From September 2022 to December 2024, 3054 patients (mean age 69 ± 12 years, 25% female) were enrolled: 56% with HFrEF, 21% with HFmrEF, and 23% with HFpEF. Among HFrEF, prescription frequencies were: 90% for beta-blockers; 19% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB); 61% for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); 72% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA); and 69% for sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Less than 60% achieved ≥50% of target doses. Quadruple therapy was received by 47% of the patients. After first visit, there was an increase in prescription of all classes of drugs, and titration to quadruple therapy was attained in 64% (p < 0.001). Among HFmrEF, 88% were on beta-blockers, 34% on ACEi/ARB, 49% on ARNI, 63% on MRA, and 59% on SGLT2i. In the HFpEF group, 76% were on beta-blockers, 49% on ACEi/ARB, 18% on ARNI, 49% on MRA and 40% on SGLT2i. After the first visit, SGLT2i prescription significantly increased both in HFmrEF (74%, p < 0.001) and HFpEF (54%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of GDMT remains suboptimal across the EF spectrum although the adoption of quadruple GDMT in HFrEF and of SGLT2i in HFmrEF and HFpEF increased in recent years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Heart FailureSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207