MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association between per- and polyfluoroalkyl chemicals and adult overweight, obesity and gestational weight gain: A scoping review

2025· article· en· W4417498756 on OpenAlexaff
Ishika Obeegadoo, Rong Luo, Laura Pelland-St-Pierre, Rose Dugandzic, Shawn G. Donaldson, S F Hayes, Sabit Cakmak, Kristian Larsen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversité de MontréalHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObesityAssociation (psychology)Birth weightGestationGestational diabetesGestational agePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants that may be associated with weight gain. This scoping review synthesizes current evidence on the relationship between PFAS exposure levels and obesity outcomes in adult populations. METHODS: The databases Medline, EMBASE, Global Health, CAB Abstracts and Scopus were used to identify articles related to PFAS and adult obesity published in English between 2009 and 2024. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers. We summarized the study characteristics and direction and magnitude of associations between PFAS and obesity metrics. RESULTS: In total, 1423 articles were identified, with 546 remaining after removing duplicates and citation searching. After screening for inclusion criteria, 55 were included for a full-text review, and 28 were ultimately included in this study. Most studies examined the following PFAS: PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, PFDA, EtFOSAA and MeFOSAA. Obesity-related outcomes included BMI, body fat percentage, and gestational weight gain. Seven studies focused on pregnant women, and 21 on a non-pregnant adult population. Among the pregnant women populations, associations were mixed for PFOA (28.6 % positive, 14.3 % negative, 57.1 % null) and PFOS (42.9 % positive, 57.1 % null). Among the non-pregnant adult populations, associations were mixed for PFOA (40 % positive, 15 % negative, 45 % null), PFOS (26.3 % positive, 10.5 % negative, 63.2 % null), and PFNA (44.4 % positive, 16.7 % negative, 38.9 % null). Associations between other types of PFAS and obesity-related outcomes were more consistently null. CONCLUSION: The evidence regarding the association between PFAS and obesity in adults is inconsistent. Associations vary based on the type of PFAS, timing of exposure, and obesity metric examined. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the relationship between PFAS and obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.005
Bibliometrics0.0140.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total EnvironmentSame topicPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFrench-language works237,207