MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417506368 · doi:10.1080/15389588.2025.2586710

Multi-section landscape intervention for driving fatigue in extra-long tunnels: A real-road driving study based on visual perception and adaptation

2025· article· en· W4417506368 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Ding, Zhigang Du, Shiming He, Pengfei Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueTraffic Injury Prevention · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)Intervention (counseling)PerceptionPoison controlVisual perceptionHuman factors and ergonomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The weak visual reference environment and prolonged driving duration in extra-long tunnels may induce driving fatigue accumulation, potentially compromising traffic safety. This study aims to investigate the impact mechanisms of multi-section landscape design on drivers' visual perception and adaptation capacities, and evaluate its effectiveness in alleviating driving fatigue. METHOD: This study was conducted in the Qinling Zhongnanshan Extra-Long Tunnel, which contained three special landscape zones. A total of thirty-two drivers were recruited to participate in real-world driving tests, and their eye movement behavior and pupil area data were collected using an eye tracker. The drivers' field of view was divided into six areas of interest (AOIs), and the spatial transfer characteristics of gaze points were analyzed. By combining kernel density estimation and visual sensitivity area (VSA) analysis, the differences in drivers' visual search breadth between the ordinary and fatigue-alleviating sections were compared. Additionally, the relative change rate of pupil area (RCRP) indicator was established to quantitatively evaluate the drivers' visual adaptation process to the landscape design. RESULTS: Landscape zones significantly improved drivers' visual perception patterns, with increased gaze transfer probabilities to roadside and top areas, and expanded horizontal VSA ranges. However, a noticeable contraction in gaze range occurred in the rear section of the tunnel, accompanied by a significantly decreased gaze transfer frequency. Pupil change analysis indicated that the landscape stimuli did not cause visual discomfort (RCRP < 20%), but revealed more sensitive pupil responses in middle and rear tunnel sections, suggesting a gradual decline in visual adaptation ability. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that multi-section landscape zones effectively regulate the allocation of drivers' visual attention by reconstructing the visual environment within tunnels. However, the intervention efficacy progressively attenuates with fatigue accumulation. Notably, drivers' visual adaptation capacity deteriorates prior to measurable declines in environmental perception. These findings provide critical evidence for optimizing fatigue-alleviating landscape design in extra-long tunnels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraffic Injury PreventionSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207