MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417508498 · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3596490

Guest Editorial of the Special section on Lightweight Large Model for Edge Computing in Consumer Devices

2025· editorial· W4417508498 on OpenAlexaff
Fa Zhu, Yudong Zhang, Athanasios V. Vasilakos, Witold Pedrycz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2025
Typeeditorial
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicBig Data and Digital Economy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecial sectionCloud computingEdge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionNode (physics)Edge deviceSection (typography)Applications of artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of ChatGPT has brought a wave of research on large models, which has greatly promoted the development of artificial intelligence (AI). However, due to the limitations of hardware, it is impossible to directly deploy large model at the edge node for intelligent computing in consumer devices. When deploying large model on the remote server, the applications in the consumer device would depend on cloud computing and networks, which may cause significant delay in decision making. TinyML can be executed on edge devices to implement real-time processing, but it does not exhibit the abilities of large model to handle complex tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsSame topicBig Data and Digital EconomyFrench-language works237,207