MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417515877 · doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101714

A liver gene signature links liver cancer risk in chronic viral hepatitis to intrahepatic IgA plasma cells

2025· article· en· W4417515877 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicolaas Van Renne, F. Ballet, Stijn Van Hees, Bart Cuypers, Arno Furquim d’Almeida, Axelle Vanderlinden, Pieter Meysman, Jordan J. Feld, Paloma Sangro, Stefan Bourgeois, D. Sprengers, Geert Robaeys, Luisa Vonghia, P. Michielsen, Sven Francque, Bruno Sangro, Owen Cain, Ahmed M. Elsharkawy, Rob de Man, André Boonstra, Harry L.A. Janssen, Ann Driessen, Kris Laukens, Thomas Vanwolleghem

Bibliographic record

VenueJHEP Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
FundersCilagFondation contre le CancerVlaamse regeringStichting Tegen KankerFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUniversiteit AntwerpenVlaams Supercomputer CentrumGilead Sciences
KeywordsHepatocellular carcinomaLiver cancerViral hepatitisGene signatureLiver biopsyTranscriptomeHepatitis CCancerAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic viral hepatitis remains a leading cause of liver cancer-related mortality worldwide. We aimed to identify genetic markers associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in precancerous liver biopsies from patients with chronic HBV or HCV infection. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter nested case-control study including biopsied patients with chronic viral hepatitis from eight hospitals across Europe and Canada. Cases developed HCC a median of 7.1 years (range 1.5-26.8) after baseline liver biopsy, irrespective of antiviral treatment initiation, and were matched to controls by age, sex, infecting virus, fibrosis stage, and follow-up duration. A semi-supervised machine-learning approach was applied to liver RNA sequencing data, with de novo HCC development as the outcome. Immunohistochemistry and serum analyses were performed on available samples. RESULTS: ) and the validation cohort (p = 0.032). The signature was externally validated for de novo HCC (n = 216; p = 0.048) and for HCC recurrence in patients with cirrhosis irrespective of viral etiology (n = 82; p = 0.026; n = 228; p = 0.030). Single-cell modular score analyses indicated that the HCC risk signature reflects fibrovascular tissue expansion, hepatocyte loss, and increased transcriptional activity of IgA-producing plasma cells. The latter correlated with periportal IgA protein staining in paired transcriptomic-immunohistochemistry analyses. In a small subcohort, serum IgA levels also correlated with liver gene expression, suggesting potential utility as a surrogate marker of liver tissue architecture. CONCLUSIONS: A 557-gene liver transcriptomic signature, including IgA plasma cell-related transcripts, identified in pretreatment liver biopsies from patients with chronic HBV or HCV infection, is associated with future HCC risk. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Chronic viral hepatitis remains a major global cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-related mortality, underscoring the need for improved risk stratification strategies. We identified a 557-gene liver transcriptomic signature, including IgA plasma cell-related transcripts, in pretreatment liver biopsies from patients with chronic hepatitis B and C that is associated with future HCC development. The expression of IgA plasma cell transcripts correlated with periportal IgA protein deposition in liver tissue, supporting their biological relevance. These findings highlight a previously underappreciated association between intrahepatic IgA plasma cells and hepatocarcinogenesis and warrant further investigation into their mechanistic role and potential utility as biomarkers or therapeutic targets for HCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJHEP ReportsSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207