Features of Social Frustration During Military Operations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The article highlights a topical issue devoted to studying the psychological impact of martial law on mental health, namely the peculiarities of social frustration among adolescents, who are the most vulnerable category in conditions of chronic social stress, uncertainty, loss of security and disruption of basic life guidelines.The aim of the study was to identify the features and psychological characteristics of social frustration in young people in conditions of martial law, to analyse levels of stress manifestations and adaptation mechanisms.Methods: The tasks included research into personality characteristics, which was carried out using the Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire (R. McCrae and P. Costa), which in turn made it possible to determine individual psychological characteristics (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness), and the diagnosis of emotional regulation and social functioning using: the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) which helped to identify difficulties in recognising and expressing emotions, and the Wasserman Social Frustration Level Diagnostic Method (modified by Boiko), which helped to analyse the level of dissatisfaction with social conditions, which increases during wartime.The following were also used: theoretical and methodological analysis, psychodiagnostic techniques, and mathematical and statistical approaches.The combination of theoretical, psychodiagnostic, and statistical methods made it possible to conduct a comprehensive study and obtain reliable scientific results.All stages of the study complied with ethical standards, in particular the principles of voluntariness, confidentiality and legal protection of research subjects.Results: The study found that the development of social frustration during the war is due to both objective and subjective factors.Conclusion: Therefore, based on the results obtained made it possible to create a model of a comprehensive programme to support the psychological health of young people during military operations, focused on stabilising their emotional state, developing adaptation strategies and psychoeducation, and improving their social well-being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".