MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417524044 · doi:10.1002/jdn.70080

Adolescent Chronic Sleep Disruption Increases Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability, but in a Time‐, Region‐ and Sex‐Dependent Manner in CD‐1 Mice

2025· article· en· W4417524044 on OpenAlexafffund
Pasquale Esposito, Luna Cappelletti, Longfei Wang, Nafissa Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPrefrontal cortexHippocampusHypothalamusCircadian rhythmSleep (system call)Central nervous systemChronic stressBrain function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During puberty and adolescence, there is a natural change in the circadian rhythm, which could result in inadequate sleep and increase the likelihood of physical and mental health issues. Previously, we have developed a mouse model showing that adolescent chronic sleep disruption (CSD) induces depression-like behaviour in male and female CD-1 mice. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect are unknown. The current study investigates blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability as a possible mechanism through which CSD may impact the brains of male and female CD-1 mice. At 6 weeks old, mice underwent either CSD for seven consecutive days or were left undisturbed. Mice were euthanized at either 24 h, 72 h, or 7 days following the last sleep disruption. BBB permeability was assessed in the whole brain and in specific brain regions (prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and hypothalamus). Results showed that at 72 h post-CSD, sleep-disrupted females had greater BBB permeability in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus than non-sleep-disrupted females and sleep-disrupted males. At 7 days post-CSD, sleep-disrupted male and female mice displayed higher BBB permeability in the hypothalamus than non-sleep-disrupted mice. These findings demonstrate that CSD increases BBB permeability in a sex-, time- and brain region-dependent manner and females may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of CSD during adolescence. Understanding the factors disrupting BBB integrity will broaden our understanding of the impact of adolescent stress on brain function and behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Developmental NeuroscienceSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207