MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417524405 · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-06447-x

De novo assembly of complete circular mitochondrial genomes from 2,695 fungal species

2025· article· en· W4417524405 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohamed S. Sarhan, Ammar Abdalrahem, Frank Maixner, Christian Fuchsberger

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche, de la Science et de la TechnologieAgence Nationale de la RechercheAustrian Science FundEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhylumGenomePhylogenetic treeMitochondrial DNAPhylogeneticsSequence assemblyFungal DiversityWhole genome sequencingTaxonomic rank

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fungal mitochondrial genomes are critical for understanding phylogenetics, evolution, and ecology of the Kingdom Fungi, yet they remain underrepresented in public databases. To address this, we developed a workflow to recover mitochondrial genomes from 12,902 fungal short read sequencing data housed in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) records, assembling complete circular genomes from 2,695 species. This effort expanded fungal mitochondrial genome diversity by nearly 2.3X particularly in understudied phyla such as Mucoromycota (11X increase) and Zoopagomycota (8X increase). The new dataset contains novel yet undescribed mitochondrial genomes at numerous taxonomic levels, including 15 classes, 64 orders, 178 families, and 544 genera. Taxonomic analysis revealed broad ecological representation among the top-assembled species, including human pathogens (e.g., Cryptococcus tetragattii), plant pathogens (e.g., Melampsora larici-populina), edible mushrooms (e.g., Suillus luteus), and industrial fungi. By leveraging the not yet fully exploited SRA sequencing data, this study fills critical gaps in fungal mitochondrial genomics, tripling the currently known mitochondrial genome diversity of the Kingdom Fungi, and provides an extensive resource for phylogenetic and evolutionary research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207