MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417525267 · doi:10.1007/s13555-025-01620-x

Short-Term Efficacy of Lebrikizumab Versus Dupilumab in Combination with Topical Corticosteroids in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

2025· article· en· W4417525267 on OpenAlexafffund
Raj Chovatiya, April W. Armstrong, Leon Kircik, L. Puig, Mark G. Kirchhof, Tiago Torres, Yousef Binamer, Gleison Vieira Duarte, M. Dossenbach, Gaia Gallo, Chao Yang, Lucia Seminario‐Vidal, Yuxin Ding, Jonathan I. Silverberg

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersLEO PharmaSun PharmaCastle BiosciencesBiogenCelgeneCelldex TherapeuticsMylanCanadian Dermatology FoundationSamsungValeant Pharmaceuticals InternationalSanofiAmgenPfizerGaldermaEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsDupilumabAtopic dermatitisMonoclonal antibodyClinical efficacyMonoclonal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison evaluated the short-term efficacy of lebrikizumab plus topical corticosteroids (TCS) versus dupilumab plus TCS in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: Individual patient data from the ADhere trial (lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W] plus TCS) and aggregate data from the CHRONOS trial (dupilumab 300 mg Q2W plus TCS) were matched using the method of moments approach to adjust baseline differences. Matching was done at the study level (primary analysis) and at the study arm level (sensitivity analysis). Efficacy endpoints up to week 16 included the proportion of patients achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1); a ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 50/75/90); a ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score (PNRS ≥ 4); and a ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index score (DLQI ≥ 4). Placebo-adjusted efficacy outcomes were compared using odds ratios (ORs), risk ratios (RRs), and risk differences (RDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: At week 16, lebrikizumab plus TCS had comparable odds to dupilumab plus TCS of achieving EASI 75 (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.42-3.09), IGA 0/1 (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.42-4.59), PNRS ≥ 4 (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.17-1.37), and DLQI ≥ 4 (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.29-2.69). At earlier timepoints, lebrikizumab plus TCS had comparable odds to dupilumab plus TCS of achieving PNRS ≥ 4 at week 2 (OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.24-17.05) and week 4 (OR 3.59, 95% CI 0.90-14.36). RR and RD estimates were consistent with OR estimates of efficacy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the findings of the primary analysis. CONCLUSION: Lebrikizumab plus TCS was comparable to dupilumab plus TCS across all efficacy endpoints at week 16.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.010
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatology and TherapySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207