MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417535400 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0336934

The mechanism of the ornamental plant variety rights value formation and enhancement strategy based on SEM-SD

2025· article· en· W4417535400 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Ornamental plantCommercializationValue captureValue (mathematics)Ranking (information retrieval)Mechanism (biology)Market value

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the acceleration of global urbanization, ornamental plants are playing an increasingly critical role in urban greening and climate regulation. Beyond improving urban landscapes, they mitigate the urban heat island effect through transpiration and enhance overall environmental quality. In developed countries, the surge of home gardening during the pandemic greatly stimulated the ornamental plant market, heightening interest in new variety development and the commercialization of plant variety rights. However, many newly bred ornamental varieties have failed to be effectively translated into productive resources, or their value has been underestimated, thereby constraining marketization. This study investigates the value formation mechanism of the Ornamental Plant Variety Rights (OPVR) and proposes optimization pathways for value enhancement. An OPVR value evaluation index system was first constructed through systematic literature review, expert consultation, and value chain analysis. A structural equation model (SEM) was then applied to examine the interrelationships among influencing factors, followed by a system dynamics (SD) model to explore the dynamic evolution of OPVR value and factor sensitivities. The SEM results indicate that four categories of factors contribute to OPVR value formation in the following order: variety value (Var)> technological level (Tec)> market and brand (Mar)> intellectual property protection (IPP). Specifically, variety value exerts both direct and indirect effects through its positive influence on technology and market performance, while IPP, though less influential, positively reinforces variety and market factors. The SD simulations further reveal that factor impacts are comparable during the first four years but diverge thereafter, with sensitivity ranking as follows: market and brand > technological level > variety value > intellectual property protection. Overall, this study clarifies the mechanisms underlying OPVR value formation and offers actionable insights for enterprises to design evidence-based strategies that enhance variety value, strengthen market positioning, and improve long-term competitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207