Diversidade e (in)dignidade: entre direitos, diferenças e desigualdades - volume 3
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diversidade e (In)Dignidade: Entre Direitos, Diferenas e Desigualdades Ao mesmo tempo, o livro recusa a armadilha da autopiedade coletiva.As minorias aqui no aparecem como figuras passivas, eternamente confinadas ao lugar da carncia.Em cada eixo temtico, seja no campo da terra e do territrio, da moradia e da cidade, da segurana pblica, do sistema de justia, da proteo socioambiental, da sade, da educao ou das novas tecnologias, o que se revela so prticas de resistncia, inveno e reconfigurao do Direito a partir das margens.Protocolos comunitrios, litgios estratgicos, formas prprias de justia restaurativa, experincias de auto-organizao, epistemologias ancestrais e solues locais de governana tornam-se,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it