MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W44263190 · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4685-5_31

WASTEWATER REUSE FOR IRRIGATION ON THE DESERT SANDY SOIL OF EGYPT: LONG-TERM EFFECT

2006· book-chapter· en· W44263190 on OpenAlexaff
Hussein I. Abdel‐Shafy, M.F. Abdel‐Sabour

Bibliographic record

VenueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Reuse
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesert (philosophy)Environmental scienceIrrigationReuseWastewaterWastewater reuseTerm (time)Hydrology (agriculture)Water resource managementEnvironmental engineeringGeologyGeotechnical engineeringAgronomyWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In Egypt, the reuse of sewage water on the sandy soil of El-Gabal El-Asfar Farm took place since 1923. The present work discusses the physical and chemical characteristic of this water. Different soil samples that were irrigated by sewage for different increasing periods were collected to investigate the changes in the soil texture as well as accumulation of heavy metals by the soils according to the period of irrigation (7, 12, 23, 40, 50 and 75 years). The overall results revealed that the longer period of irrigation demonstrated higher level of metal accumulation in the soil. The progressive increase of metals in the soil represents serious risk to the cultivated plant (as a food cycle). It is; therefore; recommended to decrease the level of heavy metals in sewage water via further simple wastewater treatment. For this purpose, a laboratory attempts were carried out to decrease the level of metals in the sewage water. Lime, as coagulant, and/or the dried leaves of Water Hyacinth plant were examined. Remarkable elimination of metals was demonstrated. It was also recommended to use the given sewage water for cultivating the woody or Lumber trees (for high economic revenue) to reduce any expected metal hazard in the food chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicWastewater Treatment and ReuseFrench-language works237,207