Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents List of Tables and Figures List of Contributors From Ontology to Methodology: Exploring the Discursive Landscape of Trust C.N.Candlin & J.Crichton PART I: TRUST IN HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE Trust in what Others Mean: Breakdowns in Interaction between Adults with Intellectual Disabilities and Support Staff C.Antaki & W.M.L.Finlay Trust, Distrust, and Communication Accommodation among Hospital Doctors D.G.Hewett , B.M.Watson & C.Gallois Engendering Trust in a Multi-party Consultation Involving an Adolescent Patient C.O'Grady & C.N.Candlin Trust after Medical Incidents K.Beitat , G.Bentele & R.Iedema At the Boundaries of the Clinic: Discourses of Trust in Amputee Care L.Manderson & N.Warren Pursuing Trust in Child Protection Meetings: Familiarization and Informality C.Hall , A.Makitalo , S.Slembrouck & P.Doherty PART II: TRUST IN EDUCATIONAL ORGANISATIONS 'Will there be flowers shoved at me?': A Study in Organisational Trust, Moral Order and Professional Integrity J.Crichton Goffman's Theory of Self and the Social Order: Trust and Conflict in an Intercultural Education Workplace M.J.Torpey & N.H.Johnson PART III: TRUST IN FINANCIAL SERVICES Achieving Professional Trustworthiness: Communicative Expertise and Identity Work in Professional Accounting Practice A.Jones & S.Sin Producing Trust in Country Financial Narratives C.Bourne Trusting the High Street Bank: Understanding Consumer Trust in a Major Financial Institution J.Delin PART IV: TRUST IN LEGAL PROCESSES 'You say 'I'm sure' but you're not, are you?': Trust and Distrust in Police Interviews F.Rock The Role of Media Discourses in Undermining Trust in the Legal Profession R.Spencer Part V: TRUST IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Nanotechnologies and Trust A.Anderson & A.Petersen The Discursive Production and Impairment of Public Trust through Rhetorical Representations of Science: The Case of Global Climate Change G.Smart Part VI: TRUST IN BUSINESS PRACTICES Trust or Betrayal: Immigrant Engineers' Employment-seeking Experiences in Canada J.Kerekes , J.Chow , A.Lemak & Z.Perhan Lack of Trust in the Organizational Context: A Study of Accounts in a Privatized Company M.do Carmo Leite de Oliveira , J.de Vilhena & J.de Vilhena Novaes Discourse Analysis, Trust and Marketing S.Halliday & M.Catulli Talking and Doing Trust in Community Relations H.Jackson
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it