The Effect of black cohosh with St. John's wort (Feramin-Q(R)) on climacteric symptoms: multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Results of several recent randomized clinical trials and epidemiological studies casted many doubts about the validity and safety of conventional hormone therapy for postmenopausal women. More and more women want to try more natural and safe ways of treating their climacteric symptoms. Black cohosh combined with St. John’s wort may be effective in climacteric symptoms alternative to hormone therapy. This multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled prospective clinical trial was carried out to evaluate the effect of the combined preparation of black cohosh and St. John’s wort, Feramin-Q, on the general climacteric symptoms, hot flushes and climacteric depression. Methods: Total of 80 postmenopausal women having moderate to severe degree of climacteric symptoms were randomly allocated to receive Feramin-Q (n=40) or placebo (n=40) daily for 12 weeks. Fifty eight subjects completed this clinical study. The primary endpoint, the relief of general climacteric symptom and hot flushes were evaluated by measuring Kupperman index and the secondary endpoint, the relief of climacteric depression by Beck Depression Inventory at 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. Results: After 4 and 12 weeks of treatment, Feramin-Q and placebo groups showed significant decline of Kupperman index and BDI scores compared with baseline scores, but Kupperman index and BDI scores between the groups were not significantly different at 12 weeks. The changes of BDI scores between the groups were different at borderline significant level (p=0.07). Hot flush scores of Feramin-Q groups were significantly decreased after 12 weeks of therapy, which showed significantly different at borderline level (p=0.07) from that of placebo. There was no statistical difference in change of hot flush scores from the baseline between the groups after 12 weeks. Among the 45 postmenopausal women with moderate to severe hot flush, Feramin-Q group showed significant decrease of hot flush scores, which was significantly different compared with placebo group at 12 weeks of therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".