MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W48489071

Transportation and Traceability of Biotech Crops

2016· article· en· W48489071 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Redick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureAgricultural biotechnologyEuropean unionBiotechnologyInternational tradeBusinessAgricultural economicsAgricultural scienceEconomicsBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

modified agricultural products, or have been in commercial pn> duction for about a decade. In that time, the number of acres devoted to biotech crops such as corn, cotton, and soybeans has increased dramatically with a billion cumulative acres worldwide. Although controversy often accompanies a discussion of biotech crops, it is safe to say they are here to stay. Biotech crops are generally subject to environmental and other regulations in their country of origin. See, e.g. , Blake A. Biles, Agricultural Biotechnology: The U.S. Perspective, 18 Nat. RESOURCES & Env't 12 (Summer 2003). An emerging issue facing biotech crops is whether they will be subject to environmental regulation by the receiving country through the regulation of their bulk transportation. This article focuses on how emerging international environmental laws will govern biotech crops, requiring regulatory approval before biotech crops can continue to be transported in bulk commodities shipments to major overseas markets of the United States and Canada. Emerging laws regulating biotech crops in nations importing agricultural commodities from the United States will drive changes in state and federal laws in the United States as exporters react to overseas developments. Two recent decisions in particular could transform the laws regulating transportation of genetically engineered biotech crops. In the first decision the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled in favor of the United States, Canada, and Argentina invalidating the moratorium the European Union (EU) imposed from 1998 to 2003 on approving biotech crops imported by EU nations for food or animal feed. The second decision arrived in March 2006 when the 134 parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Biosafety Protocol or BSP) finally reached consensus, after a decade of contentious negotiations, concerning the identification of particular biotech crops in commodities shipments. These two decisions intertwine in their legal effect and point toward a future where the first wave of biotech crops could gain a firm foothold in feeding the world, while a few reluctant nations slowly come to recognize the benefits that biotech crops can bring. While overseas nations grow more accepting of biotech crops, however, major

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFrench-language works237,207