MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W48515063

Study on the Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Patients with Schizophrenia

2010· article· en· W48515063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kei Matsushima, Koji Ogomori, Kentaro Tanaka, Rika Yano, Keiichiro Takata, Ryoji Nishimura

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWisconsin Card Sorting TestSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Clinical psychologyPsychologyWechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleStroop effectWechsler Memory ScaleTrail Making TestGlobal Assessment of FunctioningScale for the Assessment of Negative SymptomsIntervention (counseling)CognitionCognitive behavioral therapyPsychiatryBrief Psychiatric Rating ScalePsychosisCognitive impairmentNeuropsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract:Many studies have previously addressed cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT)for patients with schizophrenia in foreign countries, but there have so far been few studies on the effects of CBT for schizophrenia in Japan.This study was conducted to verify the effects of CBT on patients with schizophrenia in Japan.Twelve patients with schizophrenia were selected as subjects.The subjects were divided into 2 groups of 6 patients.One group had therapeutic intervention of CBT(CBT group) , and another group had treatment as usual(control group) for 5 weeks.The following 1 0 assessments were used for the evaluation.1) Positive and Negative Symptom Scale(PANSS) , 2)Schedule for Assessment of Insight(SAI) , 3)the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia(CDSS) , 4)Event Related Potential P3 0 0, 5)Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, 6)subtests concerned with attention and concentrations in the Wechsler Memory Scale Revised, 7)Word Fluency Test, 8)Trail Making Test, 9)Stroop Test, and 1 0)WHO QOL2 6.These assessments were conducted before and after intervention and the changes before and after intervention in assessments were compared between the 2 groups.No significant difference was detected between the groups with respect to any background index.No significant difference was detected between the groups with respect to any assessment before the intervention.The between group comparison of change after intervention in each assessment showed some significant differences.The CBT group showed a significant decrease in the subscale of PANSS score in comparison to the control group.The CBT group showed a significant increase in scores in the insight into mental symptoms, a subscale of SAI, and the total SAI, in comparison to the control group.The CBT group showed a significant decrease in the CDSS score in comparison to the control group.The CBT group showed a significant increase in the average score of QOL in the physical aspect subtest in comparison to the control group.CBT was suggested to improve symptoms, insight into disease, depression and QOL in patients with schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)→Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→