Venlafaxine in the treatment of depression in schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:Depression in schizophrenia is associated with a poor outcome, an increased risk of relapse and a high rate of suicide therefore it must be treated carefully. Venlafaxine is a dual-action serotonin and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor and is effective in treating depressive patients. Method: In this study the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine is evaluated in 8 schizophrenic patients with depression who used venlafaxine adjunctive to atypical antipsychotics. Results: The patients were assessed with Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), Scale for the Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms (SAPS and SANS) at the beginning, 4th week and 8th week. At the end of 8th week of treatment, 2 patients were fully remitted, the other 4 patients showed 80-90% improvement. Total SAPS scores dropped 2 points whereas SANS scores were dropped by 25%. No patients had an adverse event leading to an intervention. Conclusion: Venlafaxine may be an effective and safe alternative in the treatment of depression in schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".