MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W48920736

The constitution of the hispanic Baroque: timeless gazes

2008· article· es· W48920736 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ricardo L. Castro

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtBaroqueContext (archaeology)ConstitutionPhilosophyHistoryArt historyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este art?culo aborda el concepto de la constituci?n del hisp?nico desde una serie de perspectivas aparentemente poco ortodoxas. En primer lugar, sit?a el contexto temporal de la investigaci?n en la arquitectura y las pr?cticas art?sticas def?nales del siglo XX y principios del siglo XXI. En segundo lugar, propone la idea de que, en realidad, lo que normalmente se define como barroco no es sino el reflejo de una forma de mirar o ver la barroca, por as? decirlo que en realidad es atemporal; mirada selectiva y global que, hist?ricamente, ha impregnado las obras de la literatura, el arte, la arquitectura, la ciencia y la filosof?a. En tercer lugar, aqu? se sostiene que la arquitectura barroca, despu?s de sus primeras manifestaciones en Europa y posteriormente en Am?rica, se encuentra todav?a en proceso de desarrollo y establecimiento, formando parte, por lo tanto, de un sistema abierto. Estos argumentos son ilustrados a trav?s de una ex?gesis de la labor del difunto arquitecto colombiano Rogelio Salmona (1929-2007), utilizando conceptos derivados de la arquitectura, la filosof?a y la literatura. Dos de las obras maestras de Salmona constituyen el objeto de la investigaci?n: su propia casa de fin de semana, dise?ada y construida en el cambio de siglo, y la sede del Fondo de Cultura Econ?mica para Suram?rica, completada a principios de 2008.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicLiterary and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207