Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este art?culo aborda el concepto de la constituci?n del hisp?nico desde una serie de perspectivas aparentemente poco ortodoxas. En primer lugar, sit?a el contexto temporal de la investigaci?n en la arquitectura y las pr?cticas art?sticas def?nales del siglo XX y principios del siglo XXI. En segundo lugar, propone la idea de que, en realidad, lo que normalmente se define como barroco no es sino el reflejo de una forma de mirar o ver la barroca, por as? decirlo que en realidad es atemporal; mirada selectiva y global que, hist?ricamente, ha impregnado las obras de la literatura, el arte, la arquitectura, la ciencia y la filosof?a. En tercer lugar, aqu? se sostiene que la arquitectura barroca, despu?s de sus primeras manifestaciones en Europa y posteriormente en Am?rica, se encuentra todav?a en proceso de desarrollo y establecimiento, formando parte, por lo tanto, de un sistema abierto. Estos argumentos son ilustrados a trav?s de una ex?gesis de la labor del difunto arquitecto colombiano Rogelio Salmona (1929-2007), utilizando conceptos derivados de la arquitectura, la filosof?a y la literatura. Dos de las obras maestras de Salmona constituyen el objeto de la investigaci?n: su propia casa de fin de semana, dise?ada y construida en el cambio de siglo, y la sede del Fondo de Cultura Econ?mica para Suram?rica, completada a principios de 2008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".