MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W49562361

Философия Г. В. Ф. Гегеля и теория правового государства Ч. Тейлора

2009· article· ru· W49562361 on OpenAlex
Воробьев Алексей Викторович

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueИзвестия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена · 2009
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegelianismPhilosophyEnlightenmentOpposition (politics)RomanticismLawGermanCriticismPhilosophy of lawEpistemologyPublic lawPolitical scienceArt historyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is aimed at the analysis of Ch. interpretation of the Hegelian vision of the law-ordered state. It reveals Taylors understanding of Hegels law philosophy sources focusing on the German philosophers criticism of the radical French Enlightenment and his ties with the Romanticism philosophy. Despite the prevailing scholarly opposition to the Hegelian law philosophy as defending state dictatorship, Taylor emphasises the German philosophers intention to promote the rule of law reconciling individual morally grounded rights with the legislative norms based on the public ethics. Criticising the Hegelian metaphysics, the Canadian philosopher understands his theoretical heritage as a vital source of the communitarian tradition and its approach to the law-ordered state foundations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0080.002
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it