El modelo de entrenamiento: una valoración cimentada del conocimiento de los entrenadores expertos de gimnasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolUn enfoque del sistema experto (Buchanan y otros, 1983) se uso para identificar y conceptualizar el conocimiento de 17 entrenadores canadienses expertos de gimnasia de elite. El proceso de elicitacion del conocimiento incluyo preguntas abiertas y varios metodos de interrogatorio para descubrir, explorar y probar la informacion importante (Patton, 1987; Spradley, 1979) sobre el entrenamiento. Las entrevistas de todos los entrenadores se transcribieron literalmente, y los datos cualitativos no estructurados se analizaron inductivamente siguiendo los procedimientos y tecnicas de la teoria cimentada (Strauss & Corbin, 1990). El proceso inductivo de analisis permitio que las unidades significativas de las transcripciones de la entrevista se reagrupen en propiedades, categorias y componentes. Los componentes que surgen del analisis incluian (a) la competicion, (b) el entrenamiento, (c) la organizacion, (d) las caracteristicas personales del entrenador, (e) las caracteristicas personales del gimnasta y el nivel de desarrollo y (f) los factores contextuales. Estos componentes se convirtieron ademas en un modelo que representa el conocimiento de los entrenadores. EnglishAn expert system approach (Buchanan et al. 1983) was used to identify and conceptualize the knowlege of 17 Canadian expert highperformance gymnastic coaches. The knowledge elicitation process consisted of openended questions and various questioning methods to unveil, explore, and prove important information (Patton, 1987; Spradley, 1979) about coaching. All coaches’ interviews were transcribed verbatim, and the unstructured qualitative data were inductively analyzed following the procedures and techniques of grounded theory (Strauss & Cobin, 1990). The inductive analysis process allowed the meaning units of the interview transcripts to be regrouped into properties, categories, and components. The components emerging from the analysis consisted of (a) competition, (b) training, (c) organization, (d) coach’s personal characteristics, (e) gymnast’s personal characteristics and level of development, and (f) contextual factors. These components were further developed into a model representing coaches’ knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".