MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W497055

The Wall of Remembrance: Images and Themes of the Holocaust.

2003· article· en· W497055 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William E. Herman

Bibliographic record

VenueNō to shinkei Brain and nerve · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe HolocaustSociologyVisual artsArtLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This pilot study included a content analysis of the Wall of Remembrance (also known as the Children's Tile Wall) on display at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) in Washington, D.C. This artwork is composed of 3,324 six-inch square tiles depicting the impressions of children, adolescents and a few adults regarding the Holocaust. The following dominant visual images were found in this work of art: Jewish Star of David, Christian cross, Taoist yin-yang, Islamic crescent, Totemism totem pole, swastika, heart, flower, peace sign, rainbow, candle, butterfly, dove, and doll/teddy bear. The written messages included the following thematic categories: courage, anger, unfairness, pleas for help, love, remembrance, aggression, death, despair, spirituality, universality/equality, peace, hope, confidence, sadness, and freedom. The findings suggest that a full-scale exploration of this artwork ks warranted in the future. The enormity and complexity of this artwork may make it difficult for the average viewer to quickly absorb these powerful messages about the Holocaust. (Contains 10 references.) (Author) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the ori inal document. The Wall of Remembrance: Images and Themes of the Holocaust U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) o This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. O Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. William E. Herman Professor Department of Psychology State University of New York College at Potsdam Potsdam, New York 13676-2294 Office Phone: (315) 267-2610 FAX: 315-267-2677 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Poster Session presented at the 111th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August 7-10, 2003. Running head: Holocaust Themes BEST COPY AVAILABLE Holocaust Themes Page 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNō to shinkei Brain and nerveSame topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207