Una aproximación al gobierno electrónico de los Estados Unidos, Canadá y México en el marco del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEn los regimenes democraticos, el e-gobierno es un recurso que contribuye a mejorar la gestion publica. En el marco del TLCAN, se estudian los casos de Estados Unidos (reinventing government), Canada (costumer-focused) y Mexico (e-Mexico). Mientras que en los Estados Unidos y Canada se han logrado avances importantes en materia de e-gobierno, en Mexico los rezagos al respecto son considerables. Cabe acotar que la implementacion de herramientas informaticas e Internet no debe concebirse como un fin en si mismo, sino como un procedimiento para alcanzar objetivos propios de la administracion publica, sobre la que inciden de manera directa las condiciones politicas, economicas, legales, culturales y tecnologicas heredadas e imperantes en cada pais. EnglishIn the democratic regimes, e-government is a resource that contributes to improve public management. Within the NAFTA context, we study United States (reinventing government), Canada (costumer-focused) and Mexico (e-Mexico) cases. Whereas the United States and Canada have obtained important advances in the matter of e-government, the backwards in Mexico are considerable. It is possible to limit that the implementation of computer science tools and Internet does not have to be conceived like an aim in itself, but like a procedure to reach own public administration´s objectives, which are influenced by political, economic, legal, cultural and technological conditions inherits and in use in each country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it