MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 8621: Factors Associated with Superior Cavopulmonary Connection Timing and Outcomes in Infants with Single Ventricle: A Report from the Pediatric Heart Network's Infant Single Ventricle Trial

2011· article· en· W51592329 on OpenAlexaff
James Cnota, Kerstin Allen, Steven D. Colan, Wesley Covitz, Eric M. Graham, David A. Hehir, Jami C. Levine, Renée Margossian, Brian W. McCrindle, LuAnne Minich, Shobha Natarajan, Marc E. Richmond, Daphne T. Hsu

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricleCardiologyInternal medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Factors that influence the timing of the superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC) have not been well characterized. Studies identifying outcome predictors following the SCPC are contradictory. This analysis aims to identify factors associated with SCPC timing and surgical outcomes. Methods: The Pediatric Heart Network's Infant Single Ventricle trial database was used to identify participants who underwent SCPC. Age at SCPC, length of stay (LOS) and death by age 14 months were evaluated. Potential associated factors included patient demographics, measures from neonatal hospitalization and pre-SCPC visit, SCPC type, and the number of concurrent cardiac surgical procedures. Age at SCPC was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Natural log LOS was analyzed by multiple linear regression. Models were determined by stepwise selection methods adjusting for clinical site. Results: SCPC was performed in 193 subjects at a median age of 5.2 (IQR 4.2, 6.2) months and weight of 5.9 (IQR 5.3, 6.6) kg. Median LOS was 7 days (IQR 6, 10). There were 3 early deaths (during hospitalization) and 3 late deaths (between SCPC discharge and final 14 month study visit). Factors independently associated with age at SCPC and log LOS include: Other commonly cited factors including type of SCPC, valve regurgitation, ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular end-diastolic pressure were not independently associated with age at SCPC or log LOS. Conclusions: Significant variation among centers, independent of patient factors, highlights the controversy about optimal timing of SCPC. Earlier timing appears to be associated with case complexity and interim morbidities. Factors associated with LOS may offer insights for improving pre-SCPC care and surgical outcome. The risks and benefits of elective SCPC at younger age require further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→