Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contrary to V.S. Naipaul's assertion in The Middle Passage that nothing was created in the West Indies,1 a tradition of fiction in English, nurtured in its earliest years at least in part by such literary magazines as Trinidad (1929), The Beacon (1931-33 and 1939), Bim (since 1942), Focus (1943, 1948, 1956, 1960 and 1983), and K.yk-over-al (since 1945), had long been entrenched in the British Caribbean. That Austin Clarke was influenced by this tradition is beyond dispute. His first two novels,2 for instance, dissect the black experience in colonial Barbados, though from a perspective en lightened by incipient post-colonial sensitivities. Yet, while Clarke is acknowledged today as a West Indian-Canadian novelist of substance, his contribution to the West Indian and indeed the Canadian short story has re ceived relatively scant attention, this despite his publication of six collections.3 In the latter context, Clarke's significance as a West Indian Canadian writer is multi-faceted. First of all, his use of language—of Barba dian dialect, in particular—has vital socio-cultural connotations. But Clarke is also the first black West Indian-Canadian writer to probe the black West Indian immigrant experience in Canada. The themes he pursues in undertak ing that task include sexual politics, the oppression of the domestics, and the contest over space. In all of these journeys, he clarifies the nature of the black experience and adds to West Indian and Canadian literature. Clarke's achievement with language merits some discussion. Of course, Clarke is not the first to employ West Indian dialect in his works. Vic Reid, C.L.R. James and Sam Selvon, for example, were among those to precede him in this respect. But Clarke has certainly helped to reinforce this trend and consequently to revitalize the English language. As well, the infusion of an energetic Barbadian dialect into many of his stories instills in them a realism and vibrancy they would otherwise lack. As Marlene N. Philip notes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".