Effect of Maintenance Azithromycin on Established Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Lung Transplant Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), the main cause of late mortality following lung transplantation, is defined as an irreversible decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Previous studies using azithromycin for BOS in lung transplant patients have demonstrated a potential reversibility of the decline in FEV1. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether initiating azithromycin reverses decline in FEV1 in lung transplant recipients with established BOS of at least three months. METHODS: Pulmonary function tests were performed every three months in seven lung transplant recipients with established BOS of at least three months. FEV1 was recorded at six and three months before initiation, at time of initiation, and three, six, nine and 12 months postazithromycin initiation. The primary end point was change in FEV1. During the study, no immunosuppressive medication changes or acute rejection episodes occurred. RESULTS: Mean time from transplant to azithromycin initiation was 64 months (range 17 to 117 months). Mean time from BOS diagnosis to azithromycin initiation was 22 months (range three to 67 months). Rate of FEV1 decline from six months before azithromycin initiation, and rates of FEV1 increase from initiation to three and 12 months post-treatment initiation, were not statistically significant (P=0.32, P=0.16 and P=0.18, respectively). Following a trend toward improvement in the first three months after treatment initiation, FEV1 tended to stabilize. DISCUSSION: Although several studies address the possible benefit of maintenance azithromycin in lung transplant patients with BOS, the role of the drug remains unproven in these patients, and would best be addressed by a large randomized controlled trial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".