MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W53087363

A Business Impact Study of the Use of a Supersaturated Calcium Phosphate Oral Rinse (SCPOR) in the Prevention and Treatment of Oral Mucositis

2013· article· en· W53087363 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. Wayne Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Medicine and Diagnostics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucositisMedicineHead and neck cancerCancerRadiation therapyChemotherapyStomatitisInternal medicineSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oral mucositis (OM) is an inflammation of mucous membranes in the mouth with symptoms ranging from redness to severe ulcerations and pain. It is a condition that affects as many as 45,000 Canadian cancer patients annually, and around 70% of patients undergoing conditioning therapy for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Almost all patients receiving radiation therapy to the head and neck areas develop OM. Basic oral care is often not enough to reduce the duration or severity of OM in cancer patients. The author conducted a business impact study for Canadian hospitals and cancer centres of the use of a prescription, supersaturated, calcium phosphate, oral rinse (SCPOR) in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis that occurs due to high-dose chemotherapy in bone marrow transplant patients as well as in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Treatment of OM with the SCPOR for BMT patients not only provided positive, clinical results but net savings of $1,585 for a return on investment of 238.3%. The minimal net savings per head and neck cancer patient, a patient who would also be receiving clinically better care for OM, would be $663 for a return on investment of 49.8%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Medicine and DiagnosticsSame topicOral health in cancer treatmentFrench-language works237,207