In-situ monitoring of microbial biomass in wetland mesocosms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present investigation has been to combine tracer principles and a hydrolytic microbial activity assay using fluorescein diacetate to monitor changes in microbial biomass within subsurface flow wetland mesocosms. The mesocosm hydrolytic activity was referenced to activated sludge concentrations treating a typical domestic wastewater at full scale. Microbial biomass activity levels within four laboratory wetland mesocosms treating a synthetic domestic wastewater were routinely monitored over a 21-week period of plant growth and rhizosphere development. Although above ground plant mass and tracer dispersion numbers suggested progressive root zone development, plant growth did not result in any measurable enhancement in microbial activity when compared to a mesocosm operating without plants. Dispersion numbers also suggested a reduction in the mass transport kinetics in these planted mesocosms. In-situ biomass monitoring enabled the assessment of a characteristic response in terms of the steady-state food to microorganism (F/M) ratio that was observed in mesocosms receiving both low and high organic loading. Wetland treatment performance is sensitive to the degree to which bed volume is exploited in terms of wastewater flow to regions of bioactivity. The in-situ reactive tracer technique for mesocosm biomass monitoring provided an assessment of the collective substratum and rhizosphere microbial biomass in direct contact with wastewater contaminants. Thus, in-situ biomass monitoring has application in further understanding of plant function and strategies for plant implementation in wetland research and development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".