MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Eagle Soaring: <i>The Power of the Resilent Self</i>

2007· article· en· W5454179 on OpenAlexaff
Bonnie Engel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive listeningNature versus nurtureAllianceResilience (materials science)PsychologyEaglePower (physics)Focus (optics)Psychological resiliencePsychotherapistSociologyHistoryEcologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

&lt;h4&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please click &lt;a href="~/link.aspx?_id=6422DFBFBE324E648A6D22BDB780DFB5&amp;amp;_z=z"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; to read the letter to the editor.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/h4&gt; &lt;h4&gt;EXCERPT &lt;/h4&gt; &lt;p&gt;The eagle represents strength, vision, and endurance; unaffected by the storms, it soars above. How is it that some children bounce back from adversity and persevere through difficult times? In one word: resiliency. In addition, how does a child&amp;rsquo;s resiliency align with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), while remaining true to culturally competent care of a child with traditional Native American roots? This article will explore this and address the bridging of traditions with the Western world of therapy. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;h4&gt;ABOUT THE AUTHOR&lt;/h4&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ms. Engel is Clinical Specialist, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, True North Solutions, Bismarck, North Dakota. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The author discloses that she has no significant financial interests in any product or class of products discussed directly or indirectly in this activity, including research support. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Address correspondence to Bonnie Engel, MSN, RN, APRN, BC, CNS-Psychiatric, Clinical Specialist, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, True North Solutions, 418 North Second Street, Bismarck, ND 58501; e-mail: &lt;a href="mailto:truesolutions@qwest.net"&gt;truesolutions@qwest.net&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health ServicesSame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207