MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W54617552

CRASH DECK SOLUTION PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR A14 BRIDGE STRENGTHENING

2003· article· en· W54617552 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian Hawksford

Bibliographic record

VenueCONCRETE · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeckCrashEngineeringStructural engineeringSpallBridge deckForensic engineeringGirderBridge (graph theory)Computer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The A14 Huntingdon Viaduct in the UK is a post-tensioned concrete box bridge that carries the A14 over the Brampton Road overbridge and the East Coast Main Line. Strengthening required beams to be placed under the six-span viaduct to reinforce and support the half joints carrying the midspan over the railway line and road. Three major defects were identified as requiring urgent work: concrete spalling at the top of the piers, lack of reinforcement in the half joints and insufficient grouting in the post-tensioning tendons in spans three and five. An elevated cantilevered crash deck was provided to transport, position and install the steel strengthening beams and to provide a working platform for the teams installing new inspection manholes and conducting the remedial work on the tendons. The crash deck was constructed using heavy-duty welded-lattice sectional girders supported on three pairs of high-load-capacity towers. The erection of the crash deck is described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCONCRETESame topicTransportation Safety and Impact AnalysisFrench-language works237,207