Standard of Review from Decisions of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'article aborde essentiellement la question de la norme d'examen applicable aux appels de d6cisions rendues par le Tribunal du logement de l'Ontario en vertu de la Loi de 1997 sur la protection des locataires interjet6s auprbs de la Cour divisionnaire de l'Ontario.I1 y a un volume consid6rable de d6cisions contradictoires portant sur la jurisprudence d'appel sur la question.L'auteur conclut qu'une norme de bien-fond6 devrait s'appliquer aux d6cisions du Tribunal.En outre, il examine bri~vement la norme d'examen appliqu6e dans les proc6dures de r6vision du Tribunal et dans les demandes d'examen judiciaire aupr~s de la Cour divisionnaire.Pour ce qui est des examens effectu6s par le Tribunal, l'auteur conclut que le Tribunal a adopt6 une d6marche inutilement restrictive.10.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".