MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fundamental Studies of Femtosecond Laser Interactions with Solids and Their Applications to Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for Environmental Analysis

2010· article· en· W55539864 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed E. Shaheen

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersTanta UniversityCultural Affairs and Missions Sector, Ministry of Higher EducationUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsMass spectrometryInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryLaser ablationLaserFemtosecondAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AblationChemistryPlasmaInductively coupled plasmaMaterials scienceOpticsEnvironmental chemistryChromatographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) has been successfully applied in many research areas. Compared to conventional analytical techniques, it has the advantages of minimum sample preparation and high spatial resolution capabilities. Elemental and isotopic fractionation, matrix effects and the absence of matrix-matched standards are problems that limit applications of this technique for routine analysis. The introduction of femtosecond laser pulses has improved the analytical capabilities of this technique in terms of precision, accuracy and detection limits. However, laser ablation involves complex processes that are not fully understood and requires extensive studies on laser-solid interaction, particle formation, particle transport and ionization of particles in the ICP ion source. The aim of my Ph.D. is to understand the mechanisms of laser-solid interaction which can be an important step to improve the analytical capabilities of LA-ICP-MS. Effect of different gases such as hydrogen and nitrogen mixed with Ar gas before the ablation cell and the effect of nitrogen on mass bias effects in Pb isotope ratios determination using fs-LA-MC (multiple collectors)-ICP-MS have also been investigated. Another goal of my work is to validate the application of fs-LA-ICP-MS for the analysis of natural sediment cores using a simple sample preparation of different sediment reference materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207