MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W561872045

The Dead Sea Scrolls in Scholarly Perspective: A History of Research

2016· book· en· W561872045 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Devorah Dimant, Ingo Kottsieper

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDead Sea ScrollsScholarshipHebrewHistoryHebrew BibleJudaismClassicsLiteratureArtBiblical studiesArchaeologyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Devorah Dimant , Introduction DEAD SEA SCROLLS SCHOLARSHIP IN AMERICA Sidnie White Crawford, The Identification and History of the Qumran Community in American Scholarship Eileen M. Schuller, Research on the Sectarian Scrolls in North America . Eugene Ulrich, Biblical Scrolls Scholarship in North America Sidnie White Crawford, in North American Scholarship James C. VanderKam, Qumran Research in the United States: The Non-Sectarian Texts Alex P. Jassen, American Scholarship on Jewish Law in the Dead Sea Scrolls Moshe J. Bernstein and Aaron Koller, The Aramaic Texts and the Hebrew and Aramaic Languages at Qumran: The North American Contribution John J. Collins, The Scrolls and Christianity in American Scholarship Eileen M. Schuller, Canadian Scholarship on the Dead Sea Scrolls DEAD SEA SCROLLS SCHOLARSHIP IN ISRAEL Devorah Dimant, Israeli Scholarship on the Qumran Community Bilhah Nitzan, Israeli Research on the Ideology of the Qumran Community Emanuel Tov, Israeli Scholarship on the Biblical Texts from the Judean Desert Michael Segal, Qumran Research in Israel: Rewritten Bible and Biblical Interpretation Bilhah Nitzan, The Liturgical Texts from Qumran in Israeli Research Aharon Shemesh, Trends and Themes in Israeli Research of the Halakhah in the Dead Sea Scrolls Steven E. Fassberg, Israeli Research into Hebrew and Aramaic at Qumran Hanan Eshel , Excavations in the Judean Desert and at Qumran under Israeli Jurisdiction DEAD SEA SCROLLS SCHOLARSHIP IN EUROPE Emile Puech, Qumran Research: Contribution of the Ecole Biblique et Archeologique Francaise in Jerusalem Andre Lemaire, Qumran Research in France George J. Brooke, Dead Sea Scrolls Scholarship in the United Kingdom Eibert J. C. Tigchelaar, Research of Qumran Scrolls in the Netherlands Florentino Garcia Martinez and Julio Trebolle Barrera, A History of Qumran Scrolls Research in Spain Jorg Frey, Qumran Research and Biblical Scholarship in Germany Annette Steudel, Basic Research, Methods and Approaches to the Qumran Scrolls in German-Speaking Countries Corrado Martone, Qumran Research in Italy Sarianna Metso, Qumran Research in Nordic Countries Ida Frohlich, Qumran Research in Eastern and Central Europe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207