The Dead Sea Scrolls in Scholarly Perspective: A History of Research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Devorah Dimant , Introduction DEAD SEA SCROLLS SCHOLARSHIP IN AMERICA Sidnie White Crawford, The Identification and History of the Qumran Community in American Scholarship Eileen M. Schuller, Research on the Sectarian Scrolls in North America . Eugene Ulrich, Biblical Scrolls Scholarship in North America Sidnie White Crawford, in North American Scholarship James C. VanderKam, Qumran Research in the United States: The Non-Sectarian Texts Alex P. Jassen, American Scholarship on Jewish Law in the Dead Sea Scrolls Moshe J. Bernstein and Aaron Koller, The Aramaic Texts and the Hebrew and Aramaic Languages at Qumran: The North American Contribution John J. Collins, The Scrolls and Christianity in American Scholarship Eileen M. Schuller, Canadian Scholarship on the Dead Sea Scrolls DEAD SEA SCROLLS SCHOLARSHIP IN ISRAEL Devorah Dimant, Israeli Scholarship on the Qumran Community Bilhah Nitzan, Israeli Research on the Ideology of the Qumran Community Emanuel Tov, Israeli Scholarship on the Biblical Texts from the Judean Desert Michael Segal, Qumran Research in Israel: Rewritten Bible and Biblical Interpretation Bilhah Nitzan, The Liturgical Texts from Qumran in Israeli Research Aharon Shemesh, Trends and Themes in Israeli Research of the Halakhah in the Dead Sea Scrolls Steven E. Fassberg, Israeli Research into Hebrew and Aramaic at Qumran Hanan Eshel , Excavations in the Judean Desert and at Qumran under Israeli Jurisdiction DEAD SEA SCROLLS SCHOLARSHIP IN EUROPE Emile Puech, Qumran Research: Contribution of the Ecole Biblique et Archeologique Francaise in Jerusalem Andre Lemaire, Qumran Research in France George J. Brooke, Dead Sea Scrolls Scholarship in the United Kingdom Eibert J. C. Tigchelaar, Research of Qumran Scrolls in the Netherlands Florentino Garcia Martinez and Julio Trebolle Barrera, A History of Qumran Scrolls Research in Spain Jorg Frey, Qumran Research and Biblical Scholarship in Germany Annette Steudel, Basic Research, Methods and Approaches to the Qumran Scrolls in German-Speaking Countries Corrado Martone, Qumran Research in Italy Sarianna Metso, Qumran Research in Nordic Countries Ida Frohlich, Qumran Research in Eastern and Central Europe
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".