MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W563012626

Application of Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Model to Evaluate Network Traffic Impact During Bridge Closure - A Case Study in Edmonton, Alberta

2014· article· en· W563012626 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pei-Yuan Xin, Arun Bhowmick, Ido Juran

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation 2014: Past, Present, Future - 2014 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // Transport 2014 : Du passé vers l'avenir - 2014 Congrès et Exposition de 'Association des transports du Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraffic flow (computer networking)Allowance (engineering)Transport engineeringBridge (graph theory)Traffic generation modelComputer scienceQueueTraffic congestion reconstruction with Kerner's three-phase theoryReliability (semiconductor)Traffic congestionCalibrationEngineeringOperations researchReal-time computingComputer networkOperations managementStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of macroscopic travel demand models to quantify traffic operational performance measures, such as delay, queues, level of service, and corridor travel time has some significant limitations. Due to the lack of temporal variation of traffic flow in Static Traffic Assignment (STA) and allowance of demand over capacity in macroscopic travel demand models, the validity and reliability of traffic diversion estimate from major road/bridge closures are often subject to question. Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA), on the other hand, is a new and evolving technique which is sensitive to time dependent congestion phenomenon and thus can properly estimate traffic diversion to alternate routes during temporal/spatial traffic flow shifts induced by network supply or traffic demand changes. In summer 2013, the City of Edmonton closed the Stony Plain Road Bridge crossing over Groat Road for four months as part of its roadway rehabilitation program. In order to estimate traffic diversion and evaluate network traffic impacts during the construction period, a DTA model was developed using the Dynameq program. Unlike most models where both the calibration and validation data is collected from the same traffic condition, this model utilized the bridge open (pre-construction) traffic data for model calibration, and the bridge closure (during-construction) data for model validation. Additionally, since traffic demand before and during the short-term bridge closure will likely be the same, the assessment of the model forecasting capability can be considered more credible. This paper presents the DTA model development and traffic impact evaluation process, which covers data collection and analysis, traffic origin-destination demand adjustment, the DTA model network preparation, as well as model calibration and validation using the traffic conditions observed before and during the Stony Plain Road Bridge closure. It is expected that the findings and lessons learned from this study will provide practitioners the understandings and benefits of a DTA model in the application of traffic operational analysis. Recommendations on how to apply a calibrated DTA model to a short-term network supply change are also highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation 2014: Past, Present, Future - 2014 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // Transport 2014 : Du passé vers l'avenir - 2014 Congrès et Exposition de 'Association des transports du CanadaSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207