Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The Contextual Side of Professional Boxing Re-visited Preparing Professional Hockey Players for the Playoffs A Case for a New Sport Psychology: Applied Psychophysiology & fMRI Neuroscience The Psychology of Being an Olympic Favorite Psychological Preparation of Athletes for the Olympic Context: Team Culture & Team-Building From One Olympics to the Next: A Four-Year Psychological Preparation Program Introduction to Cultural Sport Psychology Revisited Revisiting Diversity & Politics in Sport Psychology Through Cultural Studies: Where Are We Five Years Later? Sport Psychology as Cultural Praxis Theoretical Approaches to Cultural Sport Psychology Through the Funhouse Mirror: Understanding Access & (Un)Expected Selves through Confessional Tales Using Psychological Skills Training from Sport Psychology to Enhance the Life Satisfaction of Adolescent Mexican Orphans Sport Psychology Consulting with Latin American Athletes A Model for Supervision of Applied Sport Psychology Consultations in Division I College Sports Ethical Decision-Making in Sport Psychology: Issues & Implications for Professional Practice Sport Psychology Consulting with Canadian Olympic Athletes & Coaches: Values & Ethical Considerations A profession of violence or a high contact sport? Ethical issues working in professional boxing Commentary Chapter Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it