Co-Administration Of Gene-Modified CD4+ T Cells Targeting HLA Class I-Restricted WT1 Epitope Diversely Enhances The Antitumor Effect Mediated By Redirected T-Cell Based Adoptive Immunotherapy Against Human Leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose In the context of redirected T-cell based antitumor adoptive immunotherapy, the therapeutic roles played by co-infused CD4+ T cells genetically redirected to the predefined HLA class I-restricted epitope which had been originally recognized by effector CD8+ T cells has not yet been fully discussed. In this study, using an HLA class I-restricted WT1 -specific T-cell receptor (TCR) gene transfer, we in detail examined antileukemia functionality mediated by these gene-modified CD4+ T cells co-infused with similarly gene-modified effector CD8+ T cells as the redirected T cell-based adoptive immunotherapy. Methods Using our unique retroviral vector expressing HLA-A*2402-restricted and WT1235-243-specific TCR a/b genes and shRNAs for endogenous TCRs (WT1-siTCR vector), we genetically modified both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from the same healthy donor or leukemia patients (termed WT1-siTCR/CD4 and WT1-siTCR/CD8, respectively). First, target-responsive cellular outputs mediated by WT1-siTCR/CD4 was thoroughly examined using flowcytometry, ELISA, 51Cr-release assay, CFSE dilution assay and bioluminescence assay. Next we similarly assessed impacts of WT1-siTCR/CD4 on the antileukemia functionality mediated by concurrentWT1-siTCR/CD8 both in vitro and in vivo. Eventually, we assessed the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of combined administration of WT1-siTCR/CD8 with WT1-siTCR/CD4 using a xenografted mouse model. Results The transcription factor profile demonstrated that WT1-siTCR/CD4 turned a terminal effector, but not regulatory phenotype. Activated WT1-siTCR/CD4 expressed cell-surface CD40L. Target-responsive cytokine production profile of WT1-siTCR/CD4 represented the Th1 helper function in the context of HLA-A*2402. HLA class II molecules expressed by leukemia cells facilitated the recognition of leukemia cells by WT1-siTCR/CD4 in the context of HLA-A*2402. WT1-siTCR/CD4 displayed the delayed cytocidal activity determined by 51Cr release assay. WT1-siTCR/CD4 could produce IFN-g in response to freshly isolated leukemia cells. WT1-siTCR/CD4 displayed the leukemia trafficking activity in vivo. WT1-siTCR/CD4 represented the potential to migrate into bone marrow via CXCR4/CXCL12 axis both in vitro and in vivo. Concurrent WT1-siTCR/CD4 augmented IFN-g production and cytotoxic degranulation mediated by WT1-siTCR/CD8 in response to the cognate epitope via humoral factors. Consequently, the cytocidal activity against autologous leukemia cells mediated by WT1-siTCR/CD8 was augmented in the presence of WT1-siTCR/CD4, both of them generated from normal lymphocytes of the same patient with leukemia in a complete remission. Upon the target recognition, activated WT1-siTCR/CD4 recruited WT1-siTCR/CD8 via CCL3/4-CCR5 axis. Proliferative response and differentiation into central memory T-cell subset mediated by WT1-siTCR/CD8 in response to the cognate epitope and leukemia cells were enhanced in the presence of autologousWT1-siTCR/CD4, but not gene-modified CD4+ T cells (NGM-CD4). CD127 expression on activated WT1-siTCR/CD8 also increased in parallel to this differentiation. Co-infused WT1-siTCR/CD4 augmented the tumor trafficking and persistence of WT1-siTCR/CD8 in vivo, resulting in the greater suppression of leukemia cells in a xenografted mouse model. Finally, in the therapeutic mouse model, co-infusion of WT1-siTCR/CD8 with of WT1-siTCR/CD4 significantly suppressed the growth of inoculated leukemia cells compared to that in mice received co-infusion of WT1-siTCR/CD8 with NGM-CD4 (Fig.1). Correlation between the therapeutic efficacy and survival of infused gene-modified T cells was also observed. Conclusion In results, the combined infusion of WT1-siTCR/CD8 with WT1-siTCR/CD4, but not NGM-CD4 obviously demonstrates the enhanced antileukemia efficacy via diverse mechanisms. Now we have just started a clinical trial using gene-modified T cells with WT1-siTCR vector for the treatment of patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia and myeloid dysplastic syndrome. Because redirected T cells employed in this trial encompassed both WT1-siTCR/CD4 and WT1-siTCR/CD8, we are planning to clinically verify the significance of WT1-siTCR/CD4 in the redirected T cell-based antileukemia adoptive immunotherapy. (Fig.1) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".