Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystalline aluminium hydroxides of hydrargillite-I (synonym of gibbsite) and II (H-I, II) and bayerite-I and II (B-I, II), in which I and II consist of the coarse and fine particles, respectively, were heated at 200-400°C under reduced pressure. The starting materials were checked up by electron microscopy and thermal analysis (TG and DTA), and then the resulting products were examined by x-ray diffraction study. Consequently, it was found that upon heating under reduced pressures at 0.667-6.67 Pa, amorphous alumina was formed from H-I and II bearing no relation to the heating rate at 1.25 or 5°C m-1, and similarly amorphous alumina was also formed from B-I and II at the rapid heating rate of 5°C m-1 ; while very poor crystalline alumina, which is regarded as the material corresponding to rho alumina (ρ-alumina) was obtained at the slow heating rate of 1.25°C m-1 from B-II, and a mixture of boehmite and ρ-alumina was obtained from B-I at the same heating rate.Accordingly it is seen that a ρ-alumina is prepared from the dehydration of bayerite which consist of fine particles by heating at 200-400°C at the slow rate under reduced pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it