Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part I. International Court of Justice: 1. Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (United Kingdom v. Iceland) 2. Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland) 3. Nuclear Tests Case (New Zealand v. France) 4. Case concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Australia) 5. Request for an Examination of the Situation in accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court's Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France) Case 6. Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict (Request by the World Health Organization for an Advisory Opinion) 7. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Request by the United Nations General Assembly for an Advisory Opinion) 8. Case concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia) 9. Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (Spain v. Canada) Part II. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: 10. Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan) (Australia v. Japan) (Requests for Provisional Measures) 11. The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom) (Request for Provisional Measures) 12. The 'Volga' Case (Russian Federation v. Australia) (Application for Prompt Release) 13. Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore) (Request for Provisional Measures) Part III. Arbitral Tribunals: 14. Southern Bluefin Tuna Case (Australia and New Zealand v. Japan) 15. The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom) 16. Dispute Concerning Access to Information under Article 9 of the OSPAR Convention (Ireland v. United Kingdom) Part IV. United Nations Compensation Commission: 17. Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners appointed to review the Well Blowout Control Claim 18. Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the First Installment of 'F4' Claims.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".