MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W566103404

ロングフェロー著『エヴァンジェリン』再考--マイエ著『エヴァンジェリーヌ二世』とのインターテクスト性をてがかりに

2007· article· ja· W566103404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
陽子 荒木, Yoko Araki

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evangeline (1847), an American narrative poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, played a crucial role in the construction of cultural identity of Acadians, a group of French-speaking Canadians mostly found in maritime provinces.The world famous poet's representation of the Great Upheaval of 1755 enabled Acadian nationalists to differentiate themselves from other French population in North America, notably Quebeckers, and proclaimed their existence to the world in the wake of Acadian Renaissance in the late nineteenth century.Acadian cultural elites of the Second Acadian Renaissance in the 1960-70s, however, protested the images of Acadians created by the Harvard professor and favored by their Acadian predecessors.One of the protests was from Antonine Maillet, an Acadian winner of the Prix Goncourt, who explicitly overturned the images of Evangeline in her play vangline Deusse (1975), a form of parody of Evangeline.Presenting a subversive anti-Evangeline character who bears the same name, Maillet attempted to present a new Acadian heroine in the era after their significant socio-cultural victory in 1960s: the Equal Opportunity Programme and Official Languages Act of 1969 in New Brunswick, Canada.Comparing the two Evangelines, this article will reexamine the problematic images of Longfellow's Evangeline still enshrined in Acadian institutions in spite of criticisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207