International engineering history and heritage : improving bridges to ASCE's 150th anniversary : proceedings of the third National Congress on Civil Engineering History and Heritage, October 10-13, 2001, Houston, Texas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
International Engineering History and Heritage: Improving Bridges to ASCE's 150th Anniversary is a collection of 60 papers presented at the Third National Congress on Civil Engineering History and Heritage as part of the American Society of Civil Engineers' National Convention held October 10-13, 2001, in Houston, Texas. These papers provide information on civil engineering history and heritage programs in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and Great Britain and on preservation, restoration, and education activities carried out on individual historic civil engineering projects in these nations. This proceedings fulfills the overwhelming need for course material to teach civil engineering history and heritage at the university level. Subjects covered include: formation of early civil engineering professional societies, international engineering history treasures, pioneering surveying journeys, international/national engineering landmarks, restoration of historic bridges, historic cathedrals and other great churches, notable engineering history developments, ASCE international and U.S. sections history congress showcase, history of civil engineering education, environmental and water resources history, historical bridges and projects in Texas, and history of civil engineering branches in Texas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".