Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ronald E. Kates and Warren Tormey, eds. Baseball and Social Class: Essays on the Democratic Game That Isn't. Jefferson NC: McFarland, 2012. 198 pp. Paper, $39.95. Ron Briley From Walt Whitman to A. G. Spalding to George Will, baseball has long been celebrated as the great national game which extolls the virtues the American dream and social mobility. In this mythology, baseball, like the American society which it reflects, is a democratic meritocracy in which anyone may succeed through talent and hard work. The reality both baseball and the American dream is more complicated with a history racial, gender, ethnic, and class bias. This gap between rhetoric and reality is the subject Baseball and Social Class edited by Ronald E. Kates and Warren Tormey, professors English at Middle Tennessee State University. In his introduction to the volume, Kates asserts, Collectively, the contributors explore the complicated class dynamics that have always existed within that great American sporting institution that has historically defined itself according to an egalitarian ethos classlessness (5). The thirteen essays included in this collection are arranged chronologically and trace the theme baseball and social class from the sport's origins to the present day. Most the essays included in the volume were originally presented at the Conference on Baseball in Literature and American Culture convened annually at Middle Tennessee State University. Accordingly, many the pieces focus upon the rich genre baseball literature as reflective the social contradictions which have defined both baseball and the American dream. In Gothic Baseball: The Death Mary Rogers and the 'Birth' Baseball History, Steve Andrews argues that while there is considerable debate regarding the father baseball, there is little attention given to the role women in the sport's origins. Andrews suggests that Mary Rogers, a New York City working girl who was found murdered in 1841 (apparently from a botched abortion), is a likely candidate. The death Rogers encouraged the formation more rules and regulations to impose some order on the chaos urban society in the 184os. Thus, in 1846 a baseball game under the rules proposed by Alexander Cartwright was played at Hoboken's Elysian Fields. The argument for Mary Rogers as the mother baseball may strain credibility for some readers, but it is a good example the provocative writing to be found in Baseball and Social Class. Baseball in the nineteenth century is also the subject Janaka B. Lewis's essay on how African Americans embraced the game. Lewis maintains that black baseball fit well with Booker T. Washington's emphasis on social uplift. Jackie Robinson, Lewis concludes, was the product of a long process the sport's integration, which developed out a long held desire for recognition and respectability that came through competing on a national (38). Almost half the essays in the collection concentrate upon baseball in the first three decades the twentieth century. Scott D. Peterson argues that the fiction authors Charles Van Loan, Ring Lardner, and Bozeman Bulger in the pages the Saturday Evening Post made baseball more acceptable to middle-class readers by emphasizing the values discipline and hard work which athletes needed to succeed in baseball and America society. Moving away from the field literature, Warren Tormey examines the career Eddie Collins, whose college background and lucrative contract led the second baseman to avoid participation in the gambling scandal on the 1919 Chicago White Sox. Collins kept his mouth shut during the Black Sox scandal and later as general manager the Boston Red Sox, when he failed to challenge the racial policies owner Tom Yawkey. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".