MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W567161001 · doi:10.2307/4126460

Literacy Research Methodologies

2005· article· fr· W567161001 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteracyMathematics educationPsychologySociologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mallette, Duke, Introduction. Barone, Case-Study Research. Stanovich, Cunningham, Inferences from Correlational Data: Exploring Associations with Reading Experience. Florio-Ruane, Morrell, Discourse Analysis: Conversation. Goldman, Wiley, Discourse Analysis: Written Text. Purcell-Gates, Ethnographic Research. Vellutino, Schatschneider, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design in Literacy Research. Reinking, Bradley, Connecting Research and Practice Using Formative and Design Experiments. Stahl, Hartman, Doing Historical Research on Literacy. Henk, McKenna, Developing Affective Instrumentation for Use in Literacy Research. Bus, van IJzendoorn, Meta-Analysis in Reading Research. Fletcher, Simos, Papanicolaou, Denton, Neuroimaging in Reading Research. Baumann, Bason, Survey Research. Pressley, Hilden, Verbal Protocols of Reading. Dressman, McCarthey, Toward a Pragmatics of Epistemology, Methodology, and Other People's Theories in Literacy Research. Duke, Mallette, Conclusion, Appendix: Alphabetical Listing of the Exemplars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it