MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W567987553

Using Specialised Tunnels to Reduce Highway Mortality of Amphibians

2010· article· en· W567987553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cyndi M. Smith, Katie S. Pagnucco, Barb Johnston, Cynthia A. Paszkowski, Garry J. Scrimgeour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildlifeCulvertHabitatGeographyPopulationFencingFisheryMark and recaptureEnvironmental scienceEcologyEngineeringBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies identified roads as a source of habitat fragmentation and mortality for amphibians in Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta, Canada, thus reducing the effects of roads became an important management issue. Vehicle traffic resulted in appreciable mortality of the Linnet Lake population of long-toed salamanders when adult and juvenile animals moved between this breeding site and terrestrial habitats. Tiger salamanders, western toads and red-sided garter snakes have also been killed by vehicles at this location. In spring 2008, drift fences and pitfall traps were installed for about 500 m along both sides of the Entrance Road that runs parallel to Linnet Lake to intercept and capture migrating amphibians attempting to cross the road. Road surveys were conducted daily before dawn for animals that evaded the fencing. Captured long-toed salamanders were marked with visible implant elastomer so a population estimate could be derived using a mark-recapture method and so that individual movement could be detected. Four specialised tunnels (AT500, built by ACO Wildlife) were installed in summer 2008 to allow long-toed salamanders and other small animals to cross safely under the road. Each tunnel is a box culvert 600 mm wide x 520 mm high. Each 1-m pre-cast segment was made of polymer concrete with slots that allowed air, moisture and light into the tunnel, creating a hospitable environment for amphibians. Segments were fitted together to span the width of the road (12 m), and set in concrete. Distances between tunnels varied from 80 m to 110 m. Installation took about two weeks; half of each tunnel was installed, traffic re-routed until the concrete set, then the other half was installed. The authors installed remotely-triggered cameras at the roof of each tunnel entrance to record animal movements. Cameras were set to detect motion and also to record images at fixed time intervals. The authors continued monitoring the population, movement patterns, and use of tunnels in 2009. In 2008 the authors captured 445 long-toed salamanders; the population was estimated at 1492 ± 214 adults. The authors also captured 15 tiger salamanders and 21 western toads. Two percent of long-toed salamanders (i.e., 10 of 445 individuals) travelling to or from Linnet Lake died on the road in 2008. Cameras photographed long-toed and tiger salamanders, western toads, and a variety of small mammals using the tunnels from 28 August to November 2008. Relatively few amphibians used the tunnels in 2008, because drift fences were still directing animals into the pitfall traps, and trapped animals were transported across the road. In spring 2009, fences were re-constructed to direct animals to the mouth of the tunnels, with one pitfall trap at the end of each tunnel. To 9 June 2009, 107 long-toed salamanders, moving both to and from the lake, have successfully navigated through the tunnels. Most images of the authors preliminary observations suggest that installation of drift fences effectively reduced road mortality and that the installation of road tunnels provides an effective and safe route of travel for a diversity of animals including long-toed salamanders. Monitoring via trapping and cameras promises to produce a meaningful assessment of the use of tunnels by amphibians and their effectiveness in reducing road mortality in Waterton Lakes National Park.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationFrench-language works237,207