From Grierson to the docu-soap : breaking the boundaries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionPart I: Grierson's legacyGrierson in Canada: The peak of his creative career? - Ian Lockerbie Stanley Hawes: A 'Grierson man' in Australia - Ina Bertand Crossing the cattle drive: Grierson and Australia - Deane Williams John Grierson in South Africa: Misunderstanding apartheid - Keyan G. Tomaselli Poru Ruta: Paul Rotha and the politics of translation - Abe Mark Nornes Germaine Dulac and French documentary film-making in the 1930s - Si n Reynolds Grierson and the public relations industry in Britain - Jacquie L'EtangPart II: The changing culture of British televisionBreaking the boundaries - John Willis Trailing documentaries - Peter Meech The docu-soap: A critical assessment - Richard Kilborn Keeping track of the locals: Governance, television and the community - Gareth Palmer Fearful and safe: Audience response to British reality programming 'You either believe it or you don't ...': Television documentary and pseudo-science - Vincent Campbell Access, authorship and voice: The emergence of community programming at the BBC - Sylvia Harvey Through the eyes of the Video Nation - Mandy Rose Towards the defining digital documentary - Brent Macgregor with Roddy Simpson Disclaimers, denials and direct address: Captioning in docudrama - Derek Paget Making connections: The European Convention on Human Rights, the Independent Television Commission and the documentary - Brian Winston Documentary and the public sphere - Michael Chanan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it